Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: avoid to hold q->limits_lock across APIs for atomic update queue limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 09:52:51AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> The local copy can be updated in any way with any data, so does another
> concurrent update on q->limits really matter?

Yes, because that means one of the updates get lost even if it is
for entirely separate fields.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux