Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes: >> If you got rid of request_idx, then this shouldn't build. So, is there >> some other prerequisite patch I'm missing? > > Yes, both you and I are. It's "mtip32xx: use runtime tag to initialize > command header" which is in Jens' for-4.12/block tree, but not in the > post-merge one. I see. With that patch, my concern about walking off the end of the array is addressed. Thanks. -Jeff