Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] block: Use enum to define RQF_x bit indexes

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>]

On 7/11/24 1:23 AM, John Garry wrote:
> +enum {
> +	/* drive already may have started this one */
> +	__RQF_STARTED		=	0,

Why " = 0"? I think this is redundant and can be left out.
Additionally, this enum definition would be easier to read if the
comments would start next to "," instead of occurring on a line of
their own.

Thanks,

Bart.