RE: [PATCH V4 for-6.10/block] loop: Fix a race between loop detach and loop open

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 8:28 PM
> To: Gulam Mohamed <gulam.mohamed@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: oe-lkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lkp@xxxxxxxxx; linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> ltp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> hch@xxxxxx; axboe@xxxxxxxxx; oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 for-6.10/block] loop: Fix a race between loop detach
> and loop open
> 
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed "ltp.ioctl09.fail" on:
> 
> commit: 02ab74c165fb204557fe6cde80eda0633fbc4412 ("[PATCH V4 for-
> 6.10/block] loop: Fix a race between loop detach and loop open")
> url: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/intel-lab-
> lkp/linux/commits/Gulam-Mohamed/loop-Fix-a-race-between-loop-detach-
> and-loop-open/20240608-
> 031123__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Niww5tWxpW_rqqBaG_-
> w8CbDvJjcC6AwSb4gYZL3tS7fUrBcYesefSCbVL8GrWLJ0R8W_jyMsgUDi0HVVA
> _7Fk4$
> base:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/axboe
> /linux-block.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Niww5tWxpW_rqqBaG_-
> w8CbDvJjcC6AwSb4gYZL3tS7fUrBcYesefSCbVL8GrWLJ0R8W_jyMsgUDi0HVSM
> 8EomQ$  for-next patch link:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240607190607.177
> 05-1-
> gulam.mohamed@xxxxxxxxxx/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Niww5tWxpW_rqq
> BaG_-
> w8CbDvJjcC6AwSb4gYZL3tS7fUrBcYesefSCbVL8GrWLJ0R8W_jyMsgUDi0HVEcY
> Yz3s$
> patch subject: [PATCH V4 for-6.10/block] loop: Fix a race between loop detach
> and loop open
> 
> in testcase: ltp
> version: ltp-x86_64-14c1f76-1_20240608
> with following parameters:
> 
> 	disk: 1HDD
> 	fs: ext4
> 	test: syscalls-03/ioctl09
> 
> 
> 
> compiler: gcc-13
> test machine: 4 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz
> (Ivy Bridge) with 8G memory
> 
> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx>
> | Closes:
> | https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/20240611213
> | 0.a572f72-
> oliver.sang@intel.com__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Niww5tWxpW_rqqBaG_
> | -
> w8CbDvJjcC6AwSb4gYZL3tS7fUrBcYesefSCbVL8GrWLJ0R8W_jyMsgUDi0HVDgL
> 6MVc$
> 
> 
> Running tests.......
> <<<test_start>>>
> tag=ioctl09 stime=1717978971
> cmdline="ioctl09"
> contacts=""
> analysis=exit
> <<<test_output>>>
> tst_test.c:1734: TINFO: LTP version: 20240524-32-ge2c52c5bb
> tst_test.c:1618: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 02m 30s
> tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0'
> ioctl09.c:48: TPASS: access /sys/block/loop0/loop0p1 succeeds
> ioctl09.c:56: TPASS: access /dev/loop0p1 succeeds
> ioctl09.c:51: TPASS: access /sys/block/loop0/loop0p2 fails
> ioctl09.c:59: TPASS: access /dev/loop0p2 fails
> ioctl09.c:48: TPASS: access /sys/block/loop0/loop0p1 succeeds
> ioctl09.c:56: TPASS: access /dev/loop0p1 succeeds
> ioctl09.c:48: TPASS: access /sys/block/loop0/loop0p2 succeeds
> ioctl09.c:56: TPASS: access /dev/loop0p2 succeeds
> tst_device.c:263: TWARN: ioctl(/dev/loop0, LOOP_CLR_FD, 0) no ENXIO for
> too long
> 
> Summary:
> passed   8
> failed   0
> broken   0
> skipped  0
> warnings 1
> incrementing stop
> <<<execution_status>>>
> initiation_status="ok"
> duration=3 termination_type=exited termination_id=4 corefile=no
> cutime=3 cstime=42
> <<<test_end>>>
> INFO: ltp-pan reported some tests FAIL
> LTP Version: 20240524-32-ge2c52c5bb
> 
> 
> ###############################################################
> 
>             Done executing testcases.
>             LTP Version:  20240524-32-ge2c52c5bb
> 
> ###############################################################
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://download.01.org/0day-
> ci/archive/20240611/202406112130.a572f72-
> oliver.sang@intel.com__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Niww5tWxpW_rqqBaG_-
> w8CbDvJjcC6AwSb4gYZL3tS7fUrBcYesefSCbVL8GrWLJ0R8W_jyMsgUDi0HVsf4L
> rkk$
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/intel/lkp-
> tests/wiki__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Niww5tWxpW_rqqBaG_-
> w8CbDvJjcC6AwSb4gYZL3tS7fUrBcYesefSCbVL8GrWLJ0R8W_jyMsgUDi0HVQRs
> yTxc$

I looked at the LTP test case failure and also the function tst_detach_device_by_fd() which failed. Our kernel patch will defer all the attempts to detach a loop device to the last close, to fix an issue.
The tst_detach_device_by_fd() in LTP test case will open the loop device and repeatedly checks for error code ENXIO. As the new approach, as I mentioned above, will defer the detach to last close and the last close happens *only* when the LTP test function tst_detach_device_by_fd() returns, the test will obviously fail. So, Can you please modify the LTP test case to accommodate the new behaviour of kernel code for loop detach?
Please let us know your comments.

Regards,
Gulam Mohamed.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux