Re: [PATCH blktests v3 10/15] nvme/{006,008,010,012,014,019,023}: support NVMET_BLKDEV_TYPES

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 28/04/2024 13:32, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
On Apr 28, 2024 / 11:58, Sagi Grimberg wrote:

On 24/04/2024 10:59, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
Enable repeated test runs for the listed test cases for
NVMET_BLKDEV_TYPES. Modify the set_conditions() hooks to call
_set_nvme_trtype_and_nvmet_blkdev_type() instead of _set_nvmet_trtype()
so that the test cases are repeated for listed conditions in
NVMET_BLKDEV_TYPES and NVMET_TRTYPES.

The default values of NVMET_BLKDEV_TYPES is (device file). With this
default set up, each of the listed test cases are run twice. The second
runs of the test cases for 'file' blkdev type do exact same test as
other test cases nvme/007, 009, 011, 013, 015, 020 and 024.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx>
---
   tests/nvme/006 | 2 +-
   tests/nvme/008 | 2 +-
   tests/nvme/010 | 2 +-
   tests/nvme/012 | 2 +-
   tests/nvme/014 | 2 +-
   tests/nvme/019 | 2 +-
   tests/nvme/023 | 2 +-
   7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/nvme/006 b/tests/nvme/006
index ff0a9eb..c543b40 100755
--- a/tests/nvme/006
+++ b/tests/nvme/006
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ requires() {
   }
   set_conditions() {
-	_set_nvme_trtype "$@"
+	_set_nvme_trtype_and_nvmet_blkdev_type "$@"
Why not calling separate functions? having func do_a_and_b interface is not
great.
In this case, we want to repeat the test cases to cover combination of two
conditions: M trtypes and N blkdev_types. The test case should be repeated to
cover all of M x N matrix elements, then the hook set_conditions() should
iterate the elements. I can not think of the way to handle this iteration with
separated two functions.

What happens when you add another condition to iterate against, you introduce set_a_and_b_and_c interface?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux