On 3/29/24 06:28, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 3/27/24 5:43 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> Moving req_bio_endio() code into its only caller, blk_update_request(), >> allows reducing accesses to and tests of bio and request fields. Also, >> given that partial completions of zone append operations is not >> possible and that zone append operations cannot be merged, the update >> of the BIO sector using the request sector for these operations can be >> moved directly before the call to bio_endio(). > > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx> > >> - if (unlikely(error && !blk_rq_is_passthrough(req) && >> - !(req->rq_flags & RQF_QUIET)) && >> - !test_bit(GD_DEAD, &req->q->disk->state)) { >> + if (unlikely(error && !blk_rq_is_passthrough(req) && !quiet) && >> + !test_bit(GD_DEAD, &req->q->disk->state)) { > > A question that is independent of this patch series: is it a bug or is > it a feature that the GD_DEAD bit test is not marked as "unlikely"? likely/unlikely are optimizations... I guess that bit test could be under unlikely() as well. Though if we are dealing with a removable media device, this may not be appropriate, which may be why it is not under unlikely(). Not sure. > > Thanks, > > Bart. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research