On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 02:40:54PM -0800, Keith Busch wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h > index 555aae5448ae4..9364c258513e0 100644 > --- a/include/linux/bvec.h > +++ b/include/linux/bvec.h > @@ -184,6 +184,12 @@ static inline void bvec_iter_advance_single(const struct bio_vec *bv, > ((bvl = bvec_iter_bvec((bio_vec), (iter))), 1); \ > bvec_iter_advance_single((bio_vec), &(iter), (bvl).bv_len)) > > +#define for_each_mp_bvec(bvl, bio_vec, iter, start) \ > + for (iter = (start); \ > + (iter).bi_size && \ > + ((bvl = mp_bvec_iter_bvec((bio_vec), (iter))), 1); \ > + bvec_iter_advance_single((bio_vec), &(iter), (bvl).bv_len)) Hope thjis isn't too much bike-shedding, but in the block layer we generally used _segment for the single page bvecs and just bvec for the not page size limited. This isn't the best naming either, but i wonder if it's worth to change the existing 4 callers and be consistent. (and maybe one or two of them doesn't want the limit anyway?) Otherwise this looks good to me.