Re: [PATCH 00/13] Pass data temperature information to zoned UFS devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 01:37:59PM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 03:14:10PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Bart!
> > 
> > > Zoned UFS vendors need the data temperature information. Hence this
> > > patch series that restores write hint information in F2FS and in the
> > > block layer. The SCSI disk (sd) driver is modified such that it passes
> > > write hint information to SCSI devices via the GROUP NUMBER field.
> > 
> > I don't have any particular problems with your implementation, although
> > I'm still trying to wrap my head around how to make this coexist with my
> > I/O hinting series. But I guess there's probably not going to be a big
> > overlap between devices that support both features.
> 
> Hello Bart, Martin,
> 
> I don't know which user facing API Martin's I/O hinting series is intending
> to use.
> 
> However, while discussing this series at ALPSS, we did ask ourselves why this
> series is not reusing the already existing block layer API for providing I/O
> hints:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v6.6-rc4/include/uapi/linux/ioprio.h#L83-L103
> 
> We can have 1023 possible I/O hints, and so far we are only using 7, which
> means that there are 1016 possible hints left.
> This also enables you to define more than the 4 previous temperature hints
> (extreme, long, medium, short), if so desired.
> 
> There is also support in fio for these I/O hints:
> https://github.com/axboe/fio/blob/master/HOWTO.rst?plain=1#L2294-L2302
> 
> When this new I/O hint API has added, there was no other I/O hint API
> in the kernel (since the old fcntl() F_GET_FILE_RW_HINT / F_SET_FILE_RW_HINT
> API had already been removed when this new API was added).
> 
> So there should probably be a good argument why we would want to introduce
> yet another API for providing I/O hints, instead of extending the I/O hint
> API that we already have in the kernel right now.
> (Especially since it seems fairly easy to modify your patches to reuse the
> existing API.)

One argument might be that the current I/O hints API does not allow hints to
be stacked. So one would not e.g. be able to combine a command duration limit
with a temperature hint...


Kind regards,
Niklas



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux