Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: don't make REQ_POLLED imply REQ_NOWAIT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/8/23 11:13?AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Normally these two flags do go together, as the issuer of polled IO
> generally cannot wait for resources that will get freed as part of IO
> completion. This is because that very task is the one that will complete
> the request and free those resources, hence that would introduce a
> deadlock.
> 
> But it is possible to have someone else issue the polled IO, eg via
> io_uring if the request is punted to io-wq. For that case, it's fine to
> have the task block on IO submission, as it is not the same task that
> will be completing the IO.
> 
> It's completely up to the caller to ask for both polled and nowait IO
> separately! If we don't allow polled IO where IOCB_NOWAIT isn't set in
> the kiocb, then we can run into repeated -EAGAIN submissions and not
> make any progress.
  
Looks like I forgot to update when adding the first half of this...
Here's the full patch 2/2:

commit 50bd4aa84442442c87e669d72d1a6d0b01c332a8
Author: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Aug 8 11:06:17 2023 -0600

    block: don't make REQ_POLLED imply REQ_NOWAIT
    
    Normally these two flags do go together, as the issuer of polled IO
    generally cannot wait for resources that will get freed as part of IO
    completion. This is because that very task is the one that will complete
    the request and free those resources, hence that would introduce a
    deadlock.
    
    But it is possible to have someone else issue the polled IO, eg via
    io_uring if the request is punted to io-wq. For that case, it's fine to
    have the task block on IO submission, as it is not the same task that
    will be completing the IO.
    
    It's completely up to the caller to ask for both polled and nowait IO
    separately! If we don't allow polled IO where IOCB_NOWAIT isn't set in
    the kiocb, then we can run into repeated -EAGAIN submissions and not
    make any progress.
    
    Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c
index a286bf3325c5..838ffada5341 100644
--- a/block/fops.c
+++ b/block/fops.c
@@ -358,13 +358,14 @@ static ssize_t __blkdev_direct_IO_async(struct kiocb *iocb,
 		task_io_account_write(bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
 	}
 
+	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
+		bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
+
 	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_HIPRI) {
-		bio->bi_opf |= REQ_POLLED | REQ_NOWAIT;
+		bio->bi_opf |= REQ_POLLED;
 		submit_bio(bio);
 		WRITE_ONCE(iocb->private, bio);
 	} else {
-		if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
-			bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
 		submit_bio(bio);
 	}
 	return -EIOCBQUEUED;
diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
index c4f5b5228105..11984ed29cb8 100644
--- a/include/linux/bio.h
+++ b/include/linux/bio.h
@@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ static inline int bio_integrity_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
 static inline void bio_set_polled(struct bio *bio, struct kiocb *kiocb)
 {
 	bio->bi_opf |= REQ_POLLED;
-	if (!is_sync_kiocb(kiocb))
+	if (kiocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT)
 		bio->bi_opf |= REQ_NOWAIT;
 }
 

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux