On Jul 26, 2023 / 14:46, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Only allow to connect to our setup target with the correct hostnqn.
>
> Thus we have to explicitly add the test hostnqn to the test subsysnqn
> allow_host list.
[...]
> --- a/tests/nvme/030
> +++ b/tests/nvme/030
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ test() {
>
> _create_nvmet_subsystem "${subsys}1" "$(losetup -f)"
> _add_nvmet_subsys_to_port "${port}" "${subsys}1"
> + _create_nvmet_host "${subsys}1" "${def_hostnqn}"
>
> genctr=$(_discovery_genctr)
>
> @@ -36,13 +37,13 @@ test() {
>
> genctr=$(_check_genctr "${genctr}" "adding a subsystem to a port")
>
> - echo 0 > "${NVMET_CFS}/subsystems/${subsys}2/attr_allow_any_host"
> + _add_nvmet_allow_hosts "${subsys}2" "${def_hostnqn}"
>
> - genctr=$(_check_genctr "${genctr}" "clearing attr_allow_any_host")
> + genctr=$(_check_genctr "${genctr}" "adding host to allow_hosts")
>
> - echo 1 > "${NVMET_CFS}/subsystems/${subsys}2/attr_allow_any_host"
> + _remove_nvmet_allow_hosts "${subsys}2" "${def_hostnqn}"
>
> - genctr=$(_check_genctr "${genctr}" "setting attr_allow_any_host")
> + genctr=$(_check_genctr "${genctr}" "removing host from allow_hosts")
>
> _remove_nvmet_subsystem_from_port "${port}" "${subsys}2"
> _remove_nvmet_subsystem "${subsys}2"
The hunk above looks different from other changes. Is it changing test
content slightly to meet request by Max? If so, it would be good to note
in the commit message.
