Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] block: Support configuring limits below the page size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 03:32:45PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/28/23 13:33, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > That's right, so the question is, is there a way to make simpler
> > modifications which might be sensible for this situation for stable
> > first, and then enhancements which don't go to stable on top ?
> > 
> > What would the minimum fix look like for stable?
> 
> Let's follow the usual process: work integrating these changes in the
> upstream kernel first and deal with backporting these changes to stable
> kernels after agreement has been achieved about what the upstream
> patches should look like.

I'm not talking about deviating away from that process.

Sometimes backporting a large chunk of changes cannot be done due the
size or other things. So one way to address this proactively is
to see if perhaps some compromises can be made for stable, while
upstream carries the rest.

I can't see a way to do this though...

So at least as-is, for the rest of the patches in this series:

Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>

  Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux