Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] block: Support configuring limits below the page size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 09:20:30AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/26/23 20:16, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > So I see this as a critical fix too. And it gets me wondering what has
> > happened for 512 byte controllers on 4K PAGE_SIZE?
> 
> What is a "512 byte controller"? Most storage controllers I'm familiar with
> support DMA segments well above 4 KiB.

Nevermind, there shouldn't be controllers as such.

> I will look into this.
> 
> > The way I'm thinking about this is, if this is a fix for stable too,
> > what would a minimum safe stable fix be like? And then after whatever
> > we need to make it better (non stable fixes).
> 
> Hmm ... doesn't the "upstream first" rule apply to stable kernels?
> Shouldn't only patches land in stable kernels that are already
> upstream instead of applying different patches on stable kernels?

That's right, so the question is, is there a way to make simpler
modifications which might be sensible for this situation for stable
first, and then enhancements which don't go to stable on top ?

What would the minimum fix look like for stable?

  Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux