On May 10, 2023 / 18:35, Daniel Wagner wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 08:00:12AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > > On 5/10/23 00:55, Xiao Yang (Fujitsu) wrote: > > > On 2023/5/10 15:35, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote: > > >> we might remove nvmeof-mp, so not sure if that part is > > >> needed, let's wait for others to reply .. > > > Hi CK, > > > > > > Thanks for your feedback. > > > Could you tell me why nvmeof-mp will be removed? Is there any URL about > > > the decision? > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Xiao Yang > > > > We talked about this in the LSFMM, I hope to see lwn article covering > > blktests session .. Yes, the conclusion at LSFMM was to remove nvmeof-mp test group, since dm- multipath for NVME devices is no longer recommended. Xiao, could you repost your patch to cover only srp? > > I think a couple of those test might make sense to be migrated to the nvme > suite. I am thinking about the test with simulate_network_failure_loop. It does not sound reasonable to keep dm-multipath tests in nvme group. I guess you mean to reuse the simulate_network_failure_loop not to test dm-multipath but to test nvme fabrics transports, right?
