Re: [PATCH blktests] common: Replace _have_module() with _have_driver()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx" <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] common: Replace _have_module() with _have_driver()
From: "Xiao Yang (Fujitsu)" <yangx.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 07:55:03 +0000
Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <9ac0b861-01a0-9dce-3d2c-5ff9e265c994@nvidia.com>
References: <20230510070207.1501-1-yangx.jy@fujitsu.com> <9ac0b861-01a0-9dce-3d2c-5ff9e265c994@nvidia.com>

On 2023/5/10 15:35, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> we might remove nvmeof-mp, so not sure if that part is
> needed, let's wait for others to reply ..

Hi CK,

Thanks for your feedback.
Could you tell me why nvmeof-mp will be removed? Is there any URL about 
the decision?

Best Regards,
Xiao Yang

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH blktests] common: Replace _have_module() with _have_driver()
  - From: Chaitanya Kulkarni

References:
- [PATCH blktests] common: Replace _have_module() with _have_driver()
  - From: Xiao Yang
- Re: [PATCH blktests] common: Replace _have_module() with _have_driver()
  - From: Chaitanya Kulkarni

Prev by Date: [PATCH] block: Deny writable memory mapping if block is read-only
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH blktests] common: Replace _have_module() with _have_driver()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH blktests] common: Replace _have_module() with _have_driver()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH blktests] common: Replace _have_module() with _have_driver()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Linux ATA RAID] [IDE] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Device Mapper]