Re: [PATCH v5 03/11] block: Introduce op_is_zoned_write()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/05/17 15:45, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 05:00:29PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 5/16/23 16:30, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> Or if you really want to rewrite this, may be something like:
>>>
>>> static inline bool bdev_op_is_zoned_write(struct block_device *bdev,
>>>    					  enum req_op op)
>>> {
>>> 	return bdev_is_zoned(bdev) &&
>>> 	       (op == REQ_OP_WRITE || op == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES);
>>> }
>>>
>>> which is very easy to understand.
>>
>> The op_is_zoned_write() function was introduced to use it in patch 4/11 of 
>> this series. Anyway, I will look into open-coding it.
> 
> I think the idea here is that we're testing for an operation that needs
> zone locking.  Maybe that needs to be reflected in the name?
> op_needs_zone_write_locking() ?

Sounds better !

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux