On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 08:06 -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> +static void *hctx_dispatch_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = m->private;
> +
> + spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
> + return seq_list_start(&hctx->dispatch, *pos);
> +}
> [ ... ]
> +static void hctx_dispatch_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = m->private;
> +
> + spin_unlock(&hctx->lock);
> +}
> [ ... ]
> +static void *ctx_rq_list_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = m->private;
> +
> + spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> + return seq_list_start(&ctx->rq_list, *pos);
> +}
> [ ... ]
> +static void ctx_rq_list_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = m->private;
> +
> + spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +}
Please add __acquires() / __releases() annotations to these functions as
appropriate to keep sparse happy.
Thanks,
Bart.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
