On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:07:10AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 12/05/2016 06:05 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:15:15PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> No functional changes with this patch, it's just in preparation for > >> supporting legacy schedulers on blk-mq. > > > > Ewww. I think without refactoring to clear what 'use_mq_path' > > means here and better naming this is a total non-started. Even with > > that we'll now have yet another code path to worry about. Is there > > any chance to instead consolidate into a single path? > > It's not pretty at all. I should have prefaced this patchset with saying > that it's an experiment in seeing what it would take to simply use the > old IO schedulers, as a temporary measure, on blk/scsi-mq. I did clean > it up a bit after posting: > > http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=blk-mq-legacy-sched > > but I'm not going to claim this is anywhere near merge read, nor clean. > > >> struct request *blk_get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw, gfp_t gfp_mask) > >> { > >> - if (q->mq_ops) > >> + if (blk_use_mq_path(q)) > >> return blk_mq_alloc_request(q, rw, > >> (gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) ? > >> 0 : BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT); > > > > So now with blk-mq and an elevator set we go into blk_old_get_request, > > hich will simply allocate new requests. How does this not break > > every existing driver? > > Since Johannes found that confusion, maybe I should explain how it all > works. To clarify the naming, how about sth. like blk_mq_use_sched() (to align with blk_mq_sched_dispatch())? -- Johannes Thumshirn Storage jthumshirn@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 689 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
