Re: [PATCHSET] Add support for simplified async direct-io

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:02:05PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I'm fine with this approach, but I would still REALLY like to see
> blkdev_bio_end_io() split in two, once for sync and once for async. That
> would be a lot cleaner, imho.

Do you still want that?  It's not in your latest tree even with all
the other changes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux