Re: [PATCH 4/4] block: bio_remaining_done( isn't unlikely

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 05:34:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We use bio chaining during most I/Os these days due to the delayed
> bio splitting.  Additionally XFS will start using it, and there is
> a pending direct I/O rewrite also making heavy use for it.  Don't
> pretend it's always unlikely, and let the branch predictor do it's
> job instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@xxxxxxx>

-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@xxxxxxx                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux