On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:05:43PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:44:05PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:49:19AM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > > > If a cgroup is inactive for some time, it should be excluded from > > > bandwidth calculation. > > > > I am not sure why do we require this patch. If group is inactive, it > > will not be on service tree and will not contribute to weight hence > > will not contrinute to share. > > The share calculation is based on existing cgroups (with this patch, > existing active cgroups). a cgroup is on service tree when it has pending > bios, right? Not having pending bios isn't a condition we should exclude > a cgroup. If a cgroup is not doing IO and is not active, then it should not be part of disk share calculation. Once cgroup is active, it should get its fair share and reduce the share of peers. Thanks Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
