On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:44:05PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 09:49:19AM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > > If a cgroup is inactive for some time, it should be excluded from > > bandwidth calculation. > > I am not sure why do we require this patch. If group is inactive, it > will not be on service tree and will not contribute to weight hence > will not contrinute to share. The share calculation is based on existing cgroups (with this patch, existing active cgroups). a cgroup is on service tree when it has pending bios, right? Not having pending bios isn't a condition we should exclude a cgroup. Thanks, Shaohua -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
