Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx> writes: > On 11/20/2015 02:43 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes: >> >>> We only added the request to the request list for the !blk-mq case, >>> so we should only delete it in that case as well. >> >> Sorry, I don't follow. Do you mean the timeout_list? It appears to me >> that blk_add_timer is called for both the old and mq paths. > > It is called for both, but only !mq adds it to the list. We don't need > that tracking on the mq side, as we can look it up in our tags. Yeah, just saw that. Thanks. -Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
