Re: [PATCH 02/47] block: fix blk_abort_request for blk-mq drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/20/2015 02:43 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:

We only added the request to the request list for the !blk-mq case,
so we should only delete it in that case as well.

Sorry, I don't follow.  Do you mean the timeout_list?  It appears to me
that blk_add_timer is called for both the old and mq paths.

It is called for both, but only !mq adds it to the list. We don't need that tracking on the mq side, as we can look it up in our tags.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux