Re: [PATCH v4 03/14] dax: use HPAGE_SIZE instead of PMD_SIZE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/09/2015 11:52 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 02:27:39PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>> As Dave points out when dealing with the contents of a page we use
>> PAGE_SIZE and PAGE_SHIFT, similary for huge pages use HPAGE_SIZE and
>> HPAGE_SHIFT.
> 
> Hang on, no.  We want to use PMD_SIZE here so that when we add PGD_SIZE
> support, it's all nicely symmetrical.

This is splitting hairs a bit, but here goes.

Do we care about the pagetables, or do we care about the page sizes?

If we are doing pagetable things, we use P{TE,MD,UD,GD}_SIZE.  If we are
doing something related to page (contents) themselves, we use
H?PAGE_SIZE.  This makes it clear whether we're dealing with pagetables,
or *contents*.

In the end, they're the same thing on our architecture at the moment, so
it matters very little.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [IDE]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux