On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:25:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:57:31PM +0000, Keith Busch wrote: > > Whoa now, it's neither Intel nor userpace that needs this. It's to know > > if the controller is unresponsive or returned an error. The difference > > matters to the driver for initialization. > > Haha, so we at least can root cause this now. Can you point me > to the caller that cares? I'd really like to get rid of the special > case of passing a negative errno here, so I'd like to figure out how > we could pass this information on instead. The "set_queue_count()" was the function that cared, but looks like patch 8/12 makes this think a timeout is an aborted status. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
