Thanks alot for the pointer Michael, I have applied this patch to my 4.14 rc8 tree will do some further testing. On 8 November 2017 at 07:15, Michael Lyle <mlyle@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Campbell-- > > Previously the device numbering was strange to allow for partitioning > bcache devices before. Coly has addressed this with his changeset > "bcache: Rewrite multiple partition support". Unfortunately, it did > not make the 4.14 merge window and is in next, slated for inclusion > with 4.15. > > Mike > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Campbell Steven <casteven@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been doing some testing so that we can move from a 4.7 kernel up >> to 4.14 at some point in the future. >> >> One thing I've noticed is that the numbering of the bcache devices is >> quite different, is there a reason it's going 0,16,32 etc.? >> >> [Tue Nov 7 13:41:54 2017] bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Caching >> sdb1 as bcache0 on set 030a5f1b-b314-482f-ba91-be1d712a4a33 >> [Tue Nov 7 14:32:45 2017] bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Caching >> sda1 as bcache16 on set 07cd8359-1427-4446-9688-d67ceb4f4b4c >> [Tue Nov 7 14:36:36 2017] bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Caching >> sdc1 as bcache32 on set 030a5f1b-b314-482f-ba91-be1d712a4a33 >> >> Thanks >> >> Campbell >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
