Re: Partitions on bcache devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:40:56 +0200
"Jens-U. Mozdzen" <jmozdzen@xxxxxx> écrivait:

> Another counter-example: You wouldn't put LVM on a disk that's  
> intended as a (100%) MD-RAID volume, and add an LV as RAID member...  
> you'll add a partition table for a reason, but no extra layer
> between the partition and the RAID stuff.
> 

I agree, but usually you wouldn't partition an MD-RAID either, would
you? OSDs are still holding (so far) ordinary filesystems locally
mounted on the nodes (except for BlueStore AFAIK).

Anyway bcache would mostly make sense for the journal, much less for
the data section, so wouldn't it better to use bcache (or flash) for
journal/metadata only?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpywH4aZJUOa.pgp
Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux