Re: 84% -> 60% cache hit ratio for same workflow, different conf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 01:35:32AM +0530, Pradeep Jindal wrote:

> > > I am facing a weird problem, I earlier had a configuration wherein my
> > > backing device was a logical volume (LVM) backed by 3 software RAID0
> > > arrays having 2x1TB disks each, so totally 6TB of storage for backing
> > > device and 300GB logical volume (LVM) backed by SSD as a caching
> > > device. Both were configured as a cache set and I was getting around
> > > 84% cache hit ratio.
> > >
> > > Now, I have changed the backing device to a bare (no LVM, no raid) 6TB
> > > disk while everything else stays same (caching device on LVM, 300GB)
> > > and for exactly same workload I am only getting 58-60% cache hit
> > > ratio.
> > >
> > > I am confused, what could be the reason?
> >
> > Full stripe size writes are configured according to the backing device,
> > for example.

> Didn't quite get it, could you please elaborate?

Backing devices that advertise a stripe size cause bcache to enable a
mode where it tries to always write a full stripe to the backing
devices, hence changing behavior of the cache.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SuSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux