Re: 84% -> 60% cache hit ratio for same workflow, different conf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Didn't quite get it, could you please elaborate?

- Pradeep Jindal


On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:47:08PM +0530, Pradeep Jindal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am facing a weird problem, I earlier had a configuration wherein my
>> backing device was a logical volume (LVM) backed by 3 software RAID0
>> arrays having 2x1TB disks each, so totally 6TB of storage for backing
>> device and 300GB logical volume (LVM) backed by SSD as a caching
>> device. Both were configured as a cache set and I was getting around
>> 84% cache hit ratio.
>>
>> Now, I have changed the backing device to a bare (no LVM, no raid) 6TB
>> disk while everything else stays same (caching device on LVM, 300GB)
>> and for exactly same workload I am only getting 58-60% cache hit
>> ratio.
>>
>> I am confused, what could be the reason?
>
> Full stripe size writes are configured according to the backing device,
> for example.
>
> --
> Vojtech Pavlik
> Director SuSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux