Re: Fwd: Bcache Status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2015-10-12 19:36 GMT+03:00 Peter Kieser <peter@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Backports of critical bug fixes not being done was brought to attention of
> Greg KH in September 2014, where Jens and myself mentioned that bcache
> stable patches (data corruption, stability, etc.) were not being backported
> to the Linux stable branches. The response from the author of bcache was
> "This kind of unnecessary hostility is why I don't bother with stable much
> anymore. I get enough of this bullshit at work, thank you."
>
> Unfortunately, the situation hasn't cahnged. bcache still will eat your data
> under certain use cases, and there is no warning and bcache still doesn't
> have a testing/experimental flag set on it. I guess the ultimate answer was
> "backport and submit a pull request yourself" but I'm not sure this is
> appropriate.


Sometimes ago i'm using bcache, but i'm lucky and dont loose my data=)
But now i'm prefer to check lvm cache status and wait for stabilization.

-- 
Vasiliy Tolstov,
e-mail: v.tolstov@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux