On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:03:57 +0000 Arne Wiebalck <Arne.Wiebalck@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser <peter@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote: > >> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, > >>> going all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's > >>> anyone that cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually > >>> use it), now would be a good time to pipe up. > >> > >> Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in > >> production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and > >> backport these though :-) > >> > >> Eddie > > > > I'm "piping up" as well, I use bcache on 3.10 in production. > > > > -Peter > > > > > More "piping up": we currently use bcache on a few nodes in > production, on 3.14 and 3.15, and plan to roll it out on a wider > scale now. If necessary we'll go with these kernels, but we'd > certainly prefer our usual 3.10-based CentOS kernel. > CentOS does not ship bcache at all. In retrospect it's obvious why. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
