On Sep 5, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Peter Kieser <peter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2014-09-05 8:37 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote: >> On 05/09/14 15:17, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> (from oldest to newest). And that's just from 3.16 to 3.17-rc3, going >>> all the way back to 3.10 would be a lot of work. If there's anyone that >>> cares about bcache on stable kernels (and actually use it), now would be >>> a good time to pipe up. >> >> Just "piping up" as I care about bcache and actually use it in production on 3.10! Shame I don't have the knowledge to try and backport these though :-) >> >> Eddie > > I'm "piping up" as well, I use bcache on 3.10 in production. > > -Peter > More "piping up": we currently use bcache on a few nodes in production, on 3.14 and 3.15, and plan to roll it out on a wider scale now. If necessary we'll go with these kernels, but we'd certainly prefer our usual 3.10-based CentOS kernel. Cheers, Arne -- Arne Wiebalck CERN IT
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
