RE: 3.10LTS ok for production?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Kent Overstreet [mailto:kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 10:47 PM
>
> Yes - 3.10 LTS (or 3.11) has been what you want to be running for awhile
> now; I've been making sure all the bugfixes get backported quickly.

Cool, thanks for the feedback. I ended up starting with a 3.11.7 kernel
after all, I'm going to play with that and see what happens. I'm looking
forward to the potential support for redundant cache devices within bcache
itself, so I won't have to mirror my two SSDs, but still have redundancy for
writeback and more overall space for read caching. Not sure what the
timeline is for that, but imagine it wouldn't be backported to 3.10.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux