On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 07:01:28PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote: > I'd kinda like to use the 3.10 LTS kernel for a virtualization server > I'm building, but it seems like every time somebody reports a problem > the recommendation is to make sure you're using the latest bleeding edge > kernel. Is it intended for bcache to be considered production ready in > the 3.10 LTS branch, or do you pretty much have to run the latest stable > of the week for now if you want to be sure to get all the bcache bugfixes > necessary for a stable system? Specifically, I'd like to use a raid1 of 2 > 256G SSDs to be a write-back cache for a raid10 of 4 2TB HDs. Occasional > reboots aren't an issue for kernel updates, but I'd prefer to avoid the > potential instability and config churn of tracking the mainline kernel. Yes - 3.10 LTS (or 3.11) has been what you want to be running for awhile now; I've been making sure all the bugfixes get backported quickly. The only bugfix I know of that I wasn't backported was a fix for a suspend issue, because it was part of a fairly involved allocator rework. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
