Le mer. 09 oct. 2013 00:39:42 CEST, matthew patton a écrit : > I'm confused as to what tree is actually safe to use. When these and > like messages go out are all of the 3.10, 3.11, 3.12 etc trees > updated to kill the bad code? There seems to be a lot of churn and as > a user I'm not sure what code-base to grab that has the > recent/obscure bugs fixed, and which are time-bombs. > > Do all of the 3.10.x Linux kernel sources work with the bcache > 3.10-stable git branch? Does 3.10-stable have *ALL* of the recent bug > fixes included? If not, why not? Same for 3.11 and friends. > > A little guidance please? 3.11.4 minus the patch I mentioned is fine in my experience; I've been running it for a while along with other people (through the bcache-for-3.11 branch). I'm not sure what corruption that patch was meant to prevent; I haven't encountered it as far as I know. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
