Re: bcache oops in bch_insert_data with the latest stables fixes (3.10.15)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm confused as to what tree is actually safe to use. When these and like messages go out are all of the 3.10, 3.11, 3.12 etc trees updated to kill the bad code? There seems to be a lot of churn and as a user I'm not sure what code-base to grab that has the recent/obscure bugs fixed, and which are time-bombs.

Do all of the 3.10.x Linux kernel sources work with the bcache 3.10-stable git branch? Does 3.10-stable have *ALL* of the recent bug fixes included? If not, why not? Same for 3.11 and friends.

A little guidance please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux