On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:08:52PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 02:02:24PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:56:50PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > Ok, I've narrowed it down a little bit -- > > > > > > It's not caused by any of the fixes that went into 3.10.[1-5]. It doesn't seem > > > to be specific to any particular storage bus, controller, disk, or even cache > > > set -- the same bcache'd usb stick will crash my laptop and not crash my test > > > box. The 4k/512b sector thing was a red herring; you can ignore that. > > > > Ok, that makes more sense... > > > > > The test box is a boring old Core2 box; the laptop is an Ivy Bridge. I'll try > > > to enable more verbose PM debugging to see if I can determine what exactly's > > > going on at sleep time. (Again, shooting in the dark...) > > > > I just looked at the code and it appears there was a freezer fix that > > didn't make it into 3.10 and should have. Can you try the > > bcache-for-3.11 branch and see if that fixes it? If so, I'll get that > > patch sent out for stable. > > The suspend problem seems to be gone with the for-3.11 branch. Good! > The branch > seems to be based off 3.10-rc7... is that correct? Yeah, that's just where it was when I sent Jens the pull request. > Also, is there any way to figure out how much of a cache device is actively > holding cached data? <cache set dir>/cache0/priority_stats -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
