Re: bcache disabled due to inconsistent ptrs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 06:57:42PM -0500, sheng qiu wrote:
> generally the flash size is 40GB, RAM is 8GB. The workload first
> writes about 65GB of data and then do read/writes (10 threads) on
> those data.
> it runs less than 1 hour during the read/write step and nearly
> happened each time. now i was testing with less threads and see if
> this is the case.

Some kind of garbage collection bug... :/

Could you try the bcache-testing branch? It's got significantly improved
garbage collection code - if it's not fixed there, at least that code
should be easier to debug...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux