Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...> writes: > I was just browsing around the code, and I bet I know what it is - > btree_insert_check_key() is failing because the btree node is full. > > But, we should confirm this really is what's going on... Can you apply > this patch and rerun to test my theory? See if the number of times the > printk fires lines up with the number of cache misses. > I applied this change and I see a LOT of the messages. And the rate seems to be increasing. -brad w. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
