Re: Block Size for Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/08/2012 23:43, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
On 27/08/2012 20:55, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 27/08/2012 20:22, Kent Overstreet wrote:
echo 1 > /sys/fs/bcache/<uuid>/unregister

echo 1 > /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/stop
Ok, so I managed to recreate everything with a block size of 512 bytes.
However, 2 bad things have happened:

1) In my Linux DomU, my fio randomwrite test have gone from about 28k iops to about 800 iops. Can this be fixed? changing bs and ba to 512 in the fio
config file didn't hep.
Ouch!

Bet the ssd doesn't like those 512 byte journal writes. I'm going to
have to think about that...
Hi Kent,

Ok, a little good news. I managed to sort out the low IOPS issue. When I formatted bcache0 with a 512 block size, I forgot to set the caching mode back to writeback. Once I did that, the IOPS were nice and high again (circa 26k IOPS). Sorry about the noise regarding that non-issue.

I re-tried the windows setup with writeback enabled for the 512B formatted cache. It kernel paniced as per-usual, however for some reason, it's kernel panicking upon every boot now, whereas when it was formatted with 4k sectors, once the system came back up, it was stable (until I tried another windows setup). The debug trace appears to be the same as the one I posted to the list (kernel BUG at fs/bio.c:420! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP).

I appreciate your time.

Thanks

I'm going to take a wild guess and say that my system is constantly throwing the same panic as there is some dirty data in the cache (that the windows setup has written) and when bcache tries to write this to the MD-RAID10 array, the kernel panics. Before when it only happened during windows setup, this was probably because I didn't have writeback enabled (or no cache setup at all), hence no dirty data.

To sum up my wild guess: The windows setup is writing certain data that is causing the MD-RAID10 array to panic the kernel.

But these are only guesses.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux