On 09/09/11 15:27, Kent Overstreet wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Greg Bowyer<gbowyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry if this is a dumb question, is bcache-3.1 an update to bcache for
kernels 3.1+
It's the current bcache code rebased onto 3.1, yeah.
I ask because I dumbly merged bcache onto the v3.0 tag today since I want to
have a play with bcache
Heh. Did you get it to compile/boot? the bcache-3.1 branch isn't
_quite_ that far.
I did get to compile and boot, although I took the bcache branch and not
bcache-3.1 (when I say compile it wont compile if I have debugging
turned on, but I am ignoring that :S)
On 08/09/11 01:49, Kent Overstreet wrote:
I just finished updating both the bcache (off 2.6.34) and the
bcache-3.1 branches with the latest stable code.
Also got cgit set up and working, finally. Need to stick a link in the
wiki to it..
http://evilpiepirate.org/git
I still haven't figured out how to pack a git repository so cloning it
doesn't take> 80% of my linode's ram, but cloning works for me so I'm
done screwing with it for now.
The bcache branch compiles but hasn't been tested. I don't expect any
issues though, it's pretty close to what I normally develop/test on.
The bcache-3.1 branch still doesn't quite compile, but it's pretty
close - I'm try and get a working version pushed tomorrow, I did boot
a linux 3.1 + bcache kernel at one point...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
