On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Greg Bowyer <gbowyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry if this is a dumb question, is bcache-3.1 an update to bcache for > kernels 3.1+ It's the current bcache code rebased onto 3.1, yeah. > I ask because I dumbly merged bcache onto the v3.0 tag today since I want to > have a play with bcache Heh. Did you get it to compile/boot? the bcache-3.1 branch isn't _quite_ that far. > > On 08/09/11 01:49, Kent Overstreet wrote: >> >> I just finished updating both the bcache (off 2.6.34) and the >> bcache-3.1 branches with the latest stable code. >> >> Also got cgit set up and working, finally. Need to stick a link in the >> wiki to it.. >> >> http://evilpiepirate.org/git >> >> I still haven't figured out how to pack a git repository so cloning it >> doesn't take> 80% of my linode's ram, but cloning works for me so I'm >> done screwing with it for now. >> >> The bcache branch compiles but hasn't been tested. I don't expect any >> issues though, it's pretty close to what I normally develop/test on. >> >> The bcache-3.1 branch still doesn't quite compile, but it's pretty >> close - I'm try and get a working version pushed tomorrow, I did boot >> a linux 3.1 + bcache kernel at one point... > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
