Re: How-to for simple recording for 3.5 hours?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sox works a treat, in my experience


On 27/09/14 08:13, Will Godfrey wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 21:48:55 +0000
Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:42:40PM +0000, Jonathan E Brickman wrote:

Last Sunday I set up my laptop for a 3.5-hour recording session, Audacity crashed after 2.5 hours.  Anyone know why this might have occurred, what to do about it, whether Audacity is in fact best for simple recording?
Timemachine may fit the bill. I once used it to record the proceedings of
a conference. Started it at 9:30 and let it run unsupervised until 18:00
or so. It did the job.
Another vote for Timemachine. I've not used it for very long runs, but found it
very lightweight, reliable and easy to use when transferring analogue tapes
into the computer. Once done I then used Audacity to find and cut to the track
boundaries.


--
David McQuire
0418 310312

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux