Re: another cpu question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 03:44:33PM +0200, Ede Wolf wrote:

> The effects stack will for most channels most likely look like this:
> reverb, delay, EQ and maybe one of flanger, chorus or rather
> seldomly compression.
>
> ...
> 
> However, I do suppose, the reverb will be the most cpu consuming
> item

But why on earth would you have a separate reverb on each track ?
There is no need to do this even if you want to control the amount
of reverb on each track separately. And mixing different reverbs
is almost never a good idea, apart from maybe some special one on
solo voice. 

Ciao,

-- 
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux