On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 09:21 -0700, Len Ovens wrote: > On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: > > > I've got both the BCR-2000 and the BCF-2000. Great devices, fully > > I have a question that the documentation doesn't seem to answer (or I am > too obtuse to get it). With the encoders, how many ticks do they offer for > a full 360 degree turn? It may help to explain my question by making a > guess which you can correct. > > I am guessing that it can do 7 bits(128) ticks in one turn (goes with the > selection mode some sw uses) and that in high resolution mode one turn > still does 128 ticks so that it would take 128 turns for 0 to full scale. > It may be possible to set resolution in between as well. That is, in 14 > bit mode, one tick may do 2, 10, 16 or some other number of consecutive 14 > bit values. I am also guessing no detents. > > Some of these assumtions are from a user POV, having 14 bits worth of > values in one turn would be very hard to get physical accuracy. That is, > it would be very hard for my fingers to turn the encoder one 14 bit tick > at a time if they were stuffed into 360 degrees. Keep in mind that the 360° of rotary knobs only should be used for some tasks. IMO it would be wise to use less than 360°, to simulate the radius of potentiometers. But I don't know how it's done by digital music mixing consoles. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user