Re: Yoshimi, in Carla?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/03/2014 11:25 AM, david wrote:
On 09/03/2014 08:23 AM, Filipe Coelho wrote:
On 09/03/2014 07:06 PM, Will Godfrey wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:28:23 +0100
Filipe Coelho <falktx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 09/01/2014 12:21 AM, Jonathan E Brickman wrote:
I am fascinated by Carla's ability to call ZASFX.  How could this be
implemented for Yoshimi?  Are there config files of some sort?
There is no reason for this to happen.
ZynAddSubFX is more stable nowadays than Yoshimi and being
maintained by
a very good developer.

Very soon I'll be releasing a LV2+VST plugin version of Zyn (based on
the last stable release).
Latest Zyn dev/git version now has fully automable parameters,
undo/redo, OSC and UI<->DSP de-coupling (no more using a super ugly
master mutex).

As much as you might want to use Yoshimi, it needs to be let go and
development focused on Zyn instead.
You know, I'm beginning to get a little tired of comments like this.

Nobody is twisting your arm. If you don't want to use Yoshimi... then
don't.
However why do you think you need to try and dissuade anyone else from
doing so?
Do you know Yoshimi's roadmap? No of course you don't. I'd guess you
don't even
know what Yoshimi can currently do.

While I intend to keep file compatibility with ZynAddSubFX as far as
possible,
we are going on a different ride - and I see no reason to reveal
exactly what
this is to such a hostile audience.

As well as having the opportunity to take Yoshimi in directions I and
friends
want, I am learning a great deal about coding in the process.
Therefore, even if
I end up being the only person running it, I intend Yoshimi to stay
around, at
least as long as I do, so you'd best get used to the idea.

This is my thing with it. I'd rather have the full focus on Zyn instead
of having 2 separate versions.
Some stuff will end up in Yoshimi that Zyn will not have and vice-versa.

With time the code will differ so much that changes can't be applied to
one another.

When Zyn did not have a maintainer Yoshimi seemed like the right thing,
but this is no longer the case.

As far as I know, Zyn has NEVER been without a maintainer. Where'd you
get that idea?

My experience with Zyn is freezes when running at low latencies. On the
same hardware running with the same settings, Yoshimi doesn't.

My experience with both Zyn and Yoshimi is that the UI sucks, with its
little non-resizable hard-coded window giving almost illegible text on
high-rez displays.

My understanding is that requests to give Zyn a modern UI fall on deaf ears because it's the way the developer likes it.

--
David W. Jones
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux