[Paul Davis] >On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Tim Goetze <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> [I have to agree that this is a far more useful approach than jack's >> current "slow-sync" and I think that for jack to become a truly >> professional tool the adoption of this state model is inevitable. > >ignoring any details of the transport API, there isn't anything that will >make JACK a "truly professional tool". I beg your forgiveness for my very poor choice of words, but still I am hopeful, even certain, that this mistake of mine will not be able to taint your habitual power of objective consideration telling you that the current approach is inferior to Fons' proposal in a number of ways. Cheers, Tim _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
