2014-06-21 19:18 GMT+02:00 Len Ovens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > As was already stated, clock speed of the interface is not really relevant. > It seems in fact that no one is really interested in USB3 because it does > not have any improvement for audio, USB2 is enough. The limitation with USB1 > is bit depth, bit rate and channel count. You are probably right about USB3 but with USB1 and USB2 speeds, how can the clock speed not be relevant? As an example, wouldn't transferring 1024 frames of float on USB1 (12Mbit) take 2,7ms and only 68us on USB2 (480Mbit)? In raw throughput that is, there are probably other factors limiting the speed? Regards, Robert _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
