On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:41:00AM +0100, Chris Cannam wrote: > One warning, the method described in it is patented -- I had to do a > hasty rewrite in some early Rubber Band code. I don't know whether > anyone enforces the patent though. Indeed... I'd be surprised if the patent is actually enforced... There's also a collection of related patents by Fraunhofer.. > > For code, maybe have a look at Rubberband which may contain > > interesting things (I don't know, never dared to look > > Probably wise -- I expect it would horrify you. And of course this > application is an incredible time-sink simply because there's no right > way to do it. It's a subject that can surely drive you mad. It sure can. Meanwhile, since you tickled me, I did have a look. I've seen worse :-) > You gave a low-level example of the problem earlier (with neighbouring > frequency bins). Looking at it at a high level, you're basically trying > to synthesise a signal that corresponds to "what the same instruments > would have sounded like if they were playing slower" (or higher, or > whatever). There's a more fundamental problem behind this. Suppose you have a sine wave at some frequency F, modulated (i.e. multiplied) by say a 8 Hz sine wave. Assume we want to transpose an octave up. Now is this signal a) just a single frequency (F) with some amplitude modulation on it, or b) two signals, at F-8 and F+8 Hz. Mathematically, and in the analysis spectrum, these are just the same thing. It's a matter of interpretation. In case (a) you'd want a sine at 2*F with the same 8 Hz modulation on it. In case (b) the wanted output is two signals at 2*(F-8) and 2*(F+8) Hz. You have the choice of interpreting the 'detail' in either the time or frequency domains. For high F, our hearing would probably favour (a). But at low frequencies things could be different. 64 Hz and 80 Hz would make a nice major third... Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
