I love the idea of FLOSS software, especially for creative work like music. Most of the time I just do small pieces of music, to experiment and to test the software. One of my dreams is to compose music and I hope I'll be able to use Floss software then. I'm enthusiastic and idealistic about Floss software, Bitwig is nice, but I miss the idealistic feeling comparing to when I use NON :) Atm I try to focus on acoustic instruments, playing (double)bass in two bands now and I realize that I've still a lot to learn when it comes to music.
Reaper via Wine, is almost against my Floss & technical principles ... I still believe in Floss software, if the devs could care more about the finishing touch and fluent integration between tools which makes a product really useful. I probably should blame myself for not giving up hope already ;)On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Atte <atte@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 04/17/2014 03:33 PM, rosea grammostola wrote:
No I didn't.
Do yourself a favor and try out reaper. The worst that can happen is that I learn something :-)Then what are *you* using?
What I see is that NON and Carla are cool, but
non-sequencer not ready and not lineair sequencing. Qtractor still lacks
JACK Midi and bus routing is strange, Ardour 3 is still a long long wait
for proper midi, that's all. :)
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
